<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>CRYPTOZOOLOGY</title>
		<link>http://midmipi.forumotion.com/cryptozoology-f9/-t1.htm</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:09:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Big Foot story dismissed</title>
			<link>http://midmipi.forumotion.com/cryptozoology-f9/big-foot-story-dismissed-t7.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>MATT</dc:creator>
			<description>October 30, 2008

Eureka, California editorial disses Bigfoot research





Regarding The Birth of Bigfoot by John Driscoll, published October 30, 2008 in the Eureka Times-Standard…



Hard to believe, isn’t it? The newspaper that published the original article in 1958 about Jerry Crew’s Bigfoot footprint casting from Bluff Creek now has published an editorial that states, “We now know the whole thing was a hoax — or a brash attempt to claim credit for one.” 



Rather than  ...</description>
			<category>CRYPTOZOOLOGY</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://midmipi.forumotion.com/cryptozoology-f9/big-foot-story-dismissed-t7.htm#8</comments>
			<guid>http://midmipi.forumotion.com/cryptozoology-f9/big-foot-story-dismissed-t7.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>