Are we too skeptical?

Ever go over your evidence and think to your self i am being to skeptical? Well I can say that is a possibility. When we do an investigation and we are able to find some sort of natural cause, I may tend to be more skeptical during evidence review. I have found myself going over evidence again and again to make sure I didn't miss anything due to being to skeptical. Some times the natural causes found may have not played an actual role into what the clients claims were, so keep that in mind, a natural cause should not bunk your whole case. Still only about 5 % out of a hundred cases were we able to gather evidence of the paranormal. I hope you like myself will not let a natural cause stop you from being fair and balanced going over the evidence. besides you (if like us) spent alot of time prepping for the case, researching, and gathering facts, so go over the evidence, and maybe you will find what the client was claiming. Debunking evidence is sometimes too easy, but what caused the happening to make you stop and say ..What was that?? Was it something natural in the home or paranormal, remembering things such as ticking clocks, loose floor boards, squeeky steps, etc., helps in debunking, ask your whole team if they remember the happening, call the client and verify some of the occurances that night (s) , thats right involve your clients... Clients should be involved in your investigations, they need to understand, and if they are present during a happening in the home, you will be there to explain what is going on. Well remember all you debunkers, if you were not their you trully don't know what was happening at that moment.
This is My Opinion.